It suffices to say this is not the "Pursuit of Perfection" as it was claimed.
204 hp is a lot if a car is really equpped with a 204 hp you'd feel it. Peak? You would not get 204 even if you rev the engine up to 7k rpm. I may sound odd to you but still entitled to say my opinion and I am always against fraud.
As long as you understand your opinion is wrong.
The car has 204 crank hp.
If it didn't, there'd have been lawsuits.
See also when Mazda had to buy back peoples RX-8s because they lied about horsepower, other companies have been through the same.
The butt dyno is a reliably horrible way to know the actual power of a car. An -actual- dyno tends to work better.
Wow... I hesitate to spend much time here getting into the details of these comments because we all have our opinions and some have lots of very good information to share.
First, a "butt dyno" can be as reliable as any SuperFlow SF-902. If you have competitvely raced, you would most likely know this. An good engine dyno and a good dyno tech can produce really neat torque data over RPM ranges with specific software algorithms that make some assumptions, but on a race track the driver can tell you things about "actual power" that a $100K dyno cannot!
Randy
????? Can you share some of that stuff your smokin?
Something's not quite right here. I'm calling tomorrow for an appointment to get my butt dyno recalibrated.