jschunke Posted December 11, 2003 Share Posted December 11, 2003 Does anyone know if the first generation ls400 engine valves were non-interfering? In other words if the timing belf breaks is there a chance that the valve will hit the piston and bend? Thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mejojo Posted December 11, 2003 Share Posted December 11, 2003 Non-interference Joe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
99lsguy Posted December 11, 2003 Share Posted December 11, 2003 Second the non-interference.... No damage if timing belt breaks. Gen I engines are the only ones like that - I believe. Gen II, III, IV will cause damage :( Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mobilyte Posted December 11, 2003 Share Posted December 11, 2003 message deleted Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanadaCraig Posted December 11, 2003 Share Posted December 11, 2003 My Lexus Service man told ME that the engine in my 1993 LS400 IS an 'interference' engine. [and that was AFTER I asked him to have the timing belt changed!!] Is what 'he' said the last word on this? No... but 'his' opinion DOES hold some weight - I think. Speaking of which... Have ANY of you EVER heard of an LS400 timing belt breaking or failing?? And I don't mean because the water pump broke and caused the belt to fail. I mean the belt - all by itself - failed or broke or whatever. Craig!! :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jschunke Posted December 11, 2003 Author Share Posted December 11, 2003 There are as many oppinions on this subject as there are lexus owners! I was under the impression that the first gen 4.0 liter was the only non-interference engine. But it seems that I may have been deceived, along with many other Lexus owners. This is a most important aspect of a belt driven engine, and personally I would not have touted my 93 LS as much as I have done so if it is in fact an interference engine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
acf Posted December 11, 2003 Share Posted December 11, 2003 A local Lexus mechanic told me my 2nd Gen LS 400 was non-interference. It seems that getting the facts about this question is harder than proving that Santa Claus doesn't exist! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
99lsguy Posted December 11, 2003 Share Posted December 11, 2003 Ditto acf! Now I'm getting confused - will make another attempt to find out! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
99lsguy Posted December 11, 2003 Share Posted December 11, 2003 Ok... Just talked to very reputable import shop that specilaizes in Acura / Lexus. 95's and up are INTERFERENCE engines...will cause damage if timing belt breaks!! 90-94 are NON-INTERFERENCE engines... will NOT Damage engine if T-belt breaks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mejojo Posted December 11, 2003 Share Posted December 11, 2003 Correct. Also, "non-interference" is often called "free-running". Joe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
99lsguy Posted December 12, 2003 Share Posted December 12, 2003 Joe, Thanks for the additional clarification :D Can we post this PERMAMENTLY somewhere? IT seems like a FAQ to the LS Forum.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanadaCraig Posted December 12, 2003 Share Posted December 12, 2003 Can we post this PERMAMENTLY somewhere? IT seems like a FAQ to the LS Forum.... Not quite yet!! I'm not convinced!! Craig!! :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
acf Posted December 12, 2003 Share Posted December 12, 2003 No offense 99 but I'm not convinced either. B) Primarily because your reputable Lexus expert shouldn't know more than MY reputable Lexus expert. :P Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
99lsguy Posted December 12, 2003 Share Posted December 12, 2003 I hear you guys - no offense taken I'm pretty sure the local lexus service rep told me the same thing - but everyone double check!! To be continued...... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mobilyte Posted December 12, 2003 Share Posted December 12, 2003 message deleted Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
acf Posted December 12, 2003 Share Posted December 12, 2003 like i posted before, let's all chip in on some gas $, i'll run my gen 1 LS until the timing belt breaks and we'll all have a definite answer. i figure the nobel prize money would cover a new car after that Not a bad idea except that won't tell me anything about MY LS! :P Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silvermate Posted December 12, 2003 Share Posted December 12, 2003 ha ha. thats a good idea, but u might be running that thing for a long while, iv'e heard of almost 300 k without timing belt breaking. on a 91 ls Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jschunke Posted December 12, 2003 Author Share Posted December 12, 2003 From what I gather its next to impossible to develop a true "free spin" engine with 4 valves per cylinder. That's because the valves are close to the edge of the cylinder. Maybe the first gen. is less likely to have interference than others, but there is always a chance (however slight it may be) for a clash with the piston if a valve is fully open and the engine continues to spin. The only real test is to remove the timing belt (or when one beaks), fully open a valve and spin the motor. Any volunteers? :o Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lexus. Posted December 13, 2003 Share Posted December 13, 2003 I thought all 97 and older are non-interference? Gen 1 and 2 engines are almost the same, with except latter has higher compression, semi-dual exhaust manifold, hot-wire air metering,... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SRK Posted December 13, 2003 Share Posted December 13, 2003 My 92 is a non-interference engine. That has been established. Engines either are or they are not. The camshaft installation procedure listed in the shop manual depends on the engine being non-interference. When the change occured to interference I do not know, but the first years of the 4.0 litre engine are N-I. It is possible make even 4 valve engines N-I by using valve reliefs in the pistons deep enough to avoid contact at TDC at full valve lift, and that is what Lexus did. If anyone had stripped a timing belt, and the engine was interference, we would have heard about it for sure. On the Volvo 16 valve 8 of the valves will hit, and the valves bend, the guides crack, and the engine is essentially unrepairable. Those who have had that happen squawk quite a bit, and I am sure Lexus folks would too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jschunke Posted December 14, 2003 Author Share Posted December 14, 2003 The transition from non-interference to interference may have occured in gen II (95 ). It's only conjecture, but the compression ratio was increased from 10.0:1 to 10.4:1, perhaps by eliminating the indentations in the pistons which made room for the intake valves. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lexus. Posted December 14, 2003 Share Posted December 14, 2003 Youre idea does have some logic to it...my 95 LS400 has 106,000 miles, bought it w/104k. The seller, who bought it at 88,000 miles, told me t-belt was changed by the previous owner. Dealer has no record of it, only record for 60k and 75k serv and some oil chngs, there are no stickers. Its poss. that it was done at private shop. Should I take the chance? Is it possible to inspect it from the outside? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lextech2k3 Posted December 14, 2003 Share Posted December 14, 2003 The main part of a 75K is the timing belt. past that it's just like a 15K service Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lextech2k3 Posted December 14, 2003 Share Posted December 14, 2003 i'll have to check but i think the ls didn't get an interference engine till the 430's were released i'll look into this and report back later Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lexus. Posted December 14, 2003 Share Posted December 14, 2003 Correct me if I'm wrong - I thought t-belt was part of 90k service not 75k - I'm not sure... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.