Well, I recently replaced (in February) my '96 ES300 with a '99 AWD RX300 with 65k miles. Now, I should have stuck with my original plan of buying a Grand Cherokee Limited after my ES ate it's transmission and outed me just under 3k to fix a few years ago and NEVER should have bought the Lexus. I was drawn to the styling of the RX though. And I convinced myself that my transmission problem was a fluke in my ES......
Well, fast forward to the here and now. After putting approximately 15k miles on my truck (which was in perfect condition with service records when purchased) I have now replaced and/or currently need: strut mounts, a mass air flow sensor, a REAR MAIN SEAL, exhaust manifold, and passenger side power window motor. I was blinded by great advertising and the (false) belief that these cars are all they claim. rest assured, I will NEVER buy another Lexus product. Advertising does wonders. A friend has a '01 Cherokee Limited. Similar miles. It's faster, definitely rides better, is roomier, and has not had ANY problems. Hmmmm. "Jeep: The relentless pursuit of perfection"? Nice ring, huh?
Now granted, all Lexus' do not have these above mentioned problems, but enough of them do. I expect nothing more from this post than to hopefully convince another potential buyer of not only the number of problems with these SUV's, but the SEVERITY of them, and costs to fix them. C'mon, a rear main seal??? How often do they go? AND (luckily enough), mine hasn't eaten it's transmission OR sludged up it's engine with gelled oil (that's a common engine problem, right??? )
Hell, my first car was a '84 Dodge Aries (I was then a 17 year old H.S. kid) with 145k miles on it. Never had a problem with it. If we compare and contrast, should these problems be expected, or more importantly, accepted? Buyers decide.
I encourage responses to this. I am very curious what everyone thinks. I don't think I am unrealistic in my anger toward all that is Lexus.