Jim67 Posted May 18, 2010 Posted May 18, 2010 My wife and I are considering buying a 2001 RX300. We need a bigger car and my parents had a great experience with theirs (180K miles, no problems, before trading in for an RX350). I've been reading about lots of transmission and other problems here in the forum, and I'm wondering if y'all recommend a 2001 RX300 or not, given your experience with your vehicles. Thanks so much. Jim
RX in NC Posted May 18, 2010 Posted May 18, 2010 Absolutely not. But that's based on our terrible experiences with a 2000 AWD model....
cduluk Posted May 19, 2010 Posted May 19, 2010 I've heard that the 02-03 Rx300's had some changes to the tranny to make them more reliable, but truthfully i don't buy it... At the age of Rx300's out there, i'd stay away from the model unless you can afford a $4k transmission job at some point
lenore Posted May 19, 2010 Posted May 19, 2010 Totally agree, dont buy, maybe a 2003 but look at the RX330 or newer...
Ericok Posted May 21, 2010 Posted May 21, 2010 As a 2000 RX300 owner, I concur - save yourself a lot of grief, do not buy this vehicle.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now