Should I Replace The 97 Sc400 With The 99 Sc300

[gk300]

I have a 97 sc400 with 120k miles (Classic Green). The car is in good shape (slight tear in the driver seat and minor crease on passenger door) and motor runs STRONG!! However, I have an amazing opportunity to purchase a 99 sc300 with 70k miles (Millenium Silver) in excellent shape for a very good price...one owner and no accidents. Would love to have both but not able at this time. Should I replace the 97 sc400 with the 99 sc300...two years newer, 50k less miles but less horsepower...What are your thoughts???

[jzz30]

go and drive it but im sure you wont like the lack of power that the 300 will offer you

[shadeelocc]

Put in a performance chip and torque converter and you'll be good!

[Sc400=Delirium Trigger]

Keep the 400, I almost did the same but just as jzz30 I missed the lack of power.

[dispin]

Dont they look the same? I think they changed the body and rear lights in 1997? I cant remember the production numbers exactly but they were definitely low in 1999. From what I remember they made less that 1k in 1999 but that might only be the SC400. I would assume it would be slower and you would get better mpg. I probably would. If youre getting a good deal on it why not.