Jonnymm Posted November 16, 2011 Posted November 16, 2011 Hi I have to decide between two cars 2008 RX 400h Hybrid with 15,000 miles for $31,500 or 2010 RX 350 Non-hybrid with 35,00 miles for $34,000 both cars are black/black with NAV and basically fully loaded will the hybrid really give me that much better gas mileage? is the new body style better? i need help have to pick up car this week Thanks Jonathan nypga@aol.com please help me
pj8708 Posted November 16, 2011 Posted November 16, 2011 Hi I have to decide between two cars 2008 RX 400h Hybrid with 15,000 miles for $31,500 or 2010 RX 350 Non-hybrid with 35,00 miles for $34,000 both cars are black/black with NAV and basically fully loaded will the hybrid really give me that much better gas mileage? is the new body style better? i need help have to pick up car this week Thanks Jonathan nypga@aol.com please help me My advice would be the 2010. The 35,000 miles are barely enough to break in the engine. LOL
Jonnymm Posted November 16, 2011 Author Posted November 16, 2011 Any reason you prefer the 2010 other than it being newer? its $2,500 more and has 20,000 more miles both cars are similarly equipped wont i save about $1,000 plus yearly on gas with hybrid? Thanks again Jonathan
pj8708 Posted November 16, 2011 Posted November 16, 2011 Any reason you prefer the 2010 other than it being newer? its $2,500 more and has 20,000 more miles both cars are similarly equipped wont i save about $1,000 plus yearly on gas with hybrid? Thanks again Jonathan The 2010 is a little more, but it is also two years newer and thereby will have less depreciation. I like the new refreshed body style of the 2010 RX350. If you are buying the hybrid, I would only buy it as a CPO, (Certified Pre-Owned), with a particular warranty on the battery. The battery will need to be changed at some point and is expensive. I haven't been convinced that the RX H has been that much better in mpg.
SW03ES Posted November 16, 2011 Posted November 16, 2011 Also, just as a matter of etiquette its extremely rude to come into our forum and blast multiple forums with the same post. One thread, properly posted is enough. I'm closing your other threads and linking them here... Anyways...which body style do you prefer? You ask us which is better, but really its your opinion that counts. Have you driven both? The hybrid powertrain is a little bit different driving experience. As for fuel savings, depends on how much you drive, and how you drive. The main benefit of the hybrid is found in the city, if you drive a lot of highway miles I think you'll find the economy is pretty similar between the two. Check out www.fueleconomy.gov. I think those prices are pretty high for both vehicles, especially that 2010 with those miles. I'd offer them $30k for it.
lenore Posted November 16, 2011 Posted November 16, 2011 Personally I prefer the older body style....Also as has been said the RX400h is faster....Mileage wise We average 23.5 all of the time...
Jonnymm Posted November 16, 2011 Author Posted November 16, 2011 Sorry about multiple posts just wanted quick help
jaswood Posted November 17, 2011 Posted November 17, 2011 Hi I have to decide between two cars 2008 RX 400h Hybrid with 15,000 miles for $31,500 or 2010 RX 350 Non-hybrid with 35,00 miles for $34,000 both cars are black/black with NAV and basically fully loaded will the hybrid really give me that much better gas mileage? is the new body style better? i need help have to pick up car this week Thanks Jonathan nypga@aol.com please help me Either one "AWD"..?? In your area I would think AWD would be the best choice.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now