Sorry, I find it a bit hard to accept that a defective MAIN O2 sensor in an engine with TWO sensors, would result in a lean misfire. Over the years I have been reponsable for the care and maintenance of a '90 LS (a Bill Gate's trade-in), a '91 LS, 3 '92's and a '95. The '90 and one of the '92's are now off the list. Amongst that group, all now pushing close too or over 200K, I have encountered numerous instances of O2 failures. ALL have result in a CEL but NONE exhibited any physical indication of fault. I assumed that once the ECU detected that one of the sensors was faulty it simply relied on the opposite for fuel trim corrections/adjustment.
Why, if you think it through, should it be otherwise.
I suspect you cleaned, as anyone would, the MAF/IAT sensors at the same time, more likely the actual "misfire" cause, as installing the O2 sensor.
Yes before changing the O2 sensor, The MAF/IAT sensors had been cleaned AND even changed without any improvement
One more thing I want to mention is that the O2 sensor was completely dead (no reading for any resistance)
I knew that this sensor was faulty (I had a CEL) but I could not imagine that this is the reason of misfire, that's why I left it to be the last option
The 2 wires leading to the sensor element will always read open. The only way I know to test those is to heat the element in our oxygen rich atmosphere and test for the output voltage to be in the proper range. It appears that if you had "read" the actual code it would indicated an open O2 sensor HEATER, not the sensor itsself. the heater is only used during initial engine start up. Once the exhaust is supplying HEAT the sensor will provide good outputs.
Yes you are right but it seems that by chance the sensor itself was also out of order
But could you elaborate more how to test it I did not understand how to test the voltage? which of the 4 wires to connect?
Thanks