Per this topic...
I can't email or PM you until I have 20 posts.
I can't email...so the "if not" seems to be implied. Is this a way to tell me to *BLEEP* off without actually havig to type those words, or did you forget that I can't email?
The way the moderators of this forum have so welcomed me (censored my post, wrongly accused me of not reading the rules, locked my thread - three things I've never before experienced in 13+ years on the net) and listned to my feedback (by focusing on justifying the rules, which I have no problem with, instead of better docuemnting the rules so they are more clear-obvious for future new users), sticking around doesn't seem likely. I'm surprised you're not interested in the observations and feedback an outsider has, especially when the feedback is specific to how your site (fails to) communicate the specifics of this forum to new users. Maybe you want to continue turning new users away by confusing them, then mocking them for not reading the undocumented rules.
I'm not sure why the original thread was locked. I was being polite and constructive. It ended up off-topic, but that could be solved without locking it (move it, without leaving a shadow, to this feedback section of the forum). Locking it limits my feedback options (can't PM/email you, like you suggest I should...can't reply to locked thread) to opening another thread (as I've done here) - which seems like a behavior you'd like to discourage instead of encourage (I imagine you'd prefer to keep discussions within a topic, not have several topics spawned for the one discussion).