Yes, I agree completely. The cars seems to use the engine more smoothly under cruise.
I believe it has other programming to improve efficiency as well. I carefully observed what I think is an interesting algorithm at work. With the cruise on, the car holds speed pretty accurately, but when you crest a hill and the engine turns off to coast, the cruise allows the speed to coast down 5mph before restarting the engine and accelerating back to the set speed. Furthermore, while it is coasting down, it runs the electric motor only (warp stealth) to try to maintain speed as long as possible before restarting the engine. To observe this, set the cruise high, 75 or so, and set the speedometer display to the energy use graphicto see speed and energy together at a glance. The system is smart. I had assumed that I could do better than any cruise system by anticipating hills and blending the speed, but this is not just a dumb setpoint only cruise control.
I have taken to driving with cruise as much as possible, using the stalk to accelerate and coast within reason in light traffic.
I really think this car should have a sport button that give you the engine always available for quick acceleration, and an economy button with much less aggressive software. One of the major benefits of all these computers is that it should be able to be two different cars at whim of the driver.
←
I tried using the cruise control over the last two days (I've never been a fan of CC) given these experiences and the difference in mpg is DRAMATIC. I drive 20 miles to work each way on the highway, and my average mpg has been about 35! It is clear that the algorithm for the CC is done to optimize battery usage. I am very impressed.
I also echo the concern of a previous poster that noticed that other drivers seem unaware of the RX400h's approach, particularly in parking lots as they back out. I have had two near-accidents as drivers glanced in the opposite direction, and because they did not hear me coming, just kept on backing up. Very disconcerting.