lcarloz211
-
Posts
2 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Gallery
Store
Articles
Videos
News & Articles
Posts posted by lcarloz211
-
-
Personally I don't think these newer Mark Levinson systems are as good as the Nakamichi systems in the older cars.
+1. Neither do I. I had a 93 SC300 5MT with the Nak system. I replaced the 10" woofer and all the amplifiers. I left the head unit, the trunk mounted changer and all the other speakers alone. I had an amazing sound system in that car. Far superior to the ML system in my F.
Lou
I recently went from a 98' es to an 02' with the ML and I thought the 98 system sounded better than my current 02'. I recently blew the sub and replaced it with an aftermarket one. I figured if I replaced it with a ML sub then it would blow again. It sounds alot better but the sub rattles a bit. Does anyone know what I can do to stop the rattling?
Mark Levinson Subwoofer Replacement And/or Repair
in 90 - 00 Lexus LS400
Posted
I have an 02' ES with the ML system and a blown sub. I recently had it replaced with an aftermarket MTX sub and it has a tendency to rattle and the sound cuts out from time to time. It will only cut out for a second but it still kind of worries me a bit. I still have the origional sub and I know where the tear is but what will it take to either fix the rattling problem with the new sub, or use the glue method and put the factory sub back in. Also if I decide to leave the new sub in what, if any, kind of damage could I possibly do to my system? Any help with these questions would be greatly appreciated.