Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Grade Of Gas Used, 87 or 91?
specialeffects
post Feb 24 2009, 08:57 PM
Post #1


New Club Member
*

Group: Regular Member
Posts: 14
Joined: 23-December 08
Member No.: 85,277
Car Model:2004, GX470
Location:Phoenix



Hi,
I woulke to start a thread to know what grade of gasoline you use and why? If that grade gives u the best mileage.

I used 87 and got 14 mpg , with 91 I get 18.5 mpg
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mann777
post Feb 24 2009, 09:43 PM
Post #2


Advanced Club Member
***

Group: Regular Member
Posts: 257
Joined: 20-November 05
From: houston
Member No.: 21,708
Car Model:LS400- 1994 / GX470-2004 / LS460 - 2007
Location:HOUSTON



I use 91, but all also depends on your ride, the usuage of A/c, Currently I get around 17mpg.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
The G Man
post Feb 25 2009, 08:19 AM
Post #3


Dedicated Member
****

Group: Regular Member
Posts: 656
Joined: 3-October 05
Member No.: 20,908
Car Model:GS350 AWD
Location:Boston, Massachusetts



QUOTE (specialeffects @ Feb 24 2009, 09:57 PM) *
Hi,
I woulke to start a thread to know what grade of gasoline you use and why? If that grade gives u the best mileage.

I used 87 and got 14 mpg , with 91 I get 18.5 mpg


There is no way you can get that big of a difference in mileage lol.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Spirit of 1776
post Feb 25 2009, 01:05 PM
Post #4


New Club Member
*

Group: Regular Member
Posts: 8
Joined: 29-December 08
Member No.: 85,596
Car Model:2004 GX470
Location:Colorado




If your GX is 2005 or newer use 91 Octane. 2003 & 2004 models are fine with 87 Octane.

Also, altitude can also play a factor. If you live above 6,000 feet, 87 Octane will actually be nearly identical to 91 Octane in terms of performance. So high-altitude residents could use 87 Octance regardless of model year.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lazybummm
post Feb 25 2009, 01:45 PM
Post #5


New Club Member
*

Group: Regular Member
Posts: 2
Joined: 19-July 08
Member No.: 75,804
Car Model:GX470
Location:So Cal



QUOTE (Randy&Bonnie @ Feb 25 2009, 12:26 PM) *
QUOTE (Spirit of 1776 @ Feb 25 2009, 12:05 PM) *
If your GX is 2005 or newer use 91 Octane. 2003 & 2004 models are fine with 87 Octane.

Also, altitude can also play a factor. If you live above 6,000 feet, 87 Octane will actually be nearly identical to 91 Octane in terms of performance. So high-altitude residents could use 87 Octance regardless of model year.


Spirit... is right on....

This is true. Altitude can have a radical effect on fuel consumption. The ECU controlled FI systems in today's engines have excellent compensation built in, like High Altitude compensators that advance ignition timing, etc, but it would not be unusual to see a 3 to 4 HP drop for every 1,000 feet in elevation increase.

It's also true at high elevations, typically higher octane fuel will not compensate for the lack of Oxygen, and actually may "burn" better than 91 octane.



been pumping 87 in a 2004 gx for years, gets about 16.8-17mpg combined...up to 19 for mostly highway
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mann777
post Feb 25 2009, 10:19 PM
Post #6


Advanced Club Member
***

Group: Regular Member
Posts: 257
Joined: 20-November 05
From: houston
Member No.: 21,708
Car Model:LS400- 1994 / GX470-2004 / LS460 - 2007
Location:HOUSTON



One point on saving fuel that is never mentioned is using the brake as little as possible. The brake converts kinetic energy into heat energy which is then lost.we likely feel desperate whenever we heard 'bout higher gas prices that is ravaging us these days.. so some are thinking of necessary measures to address this problem such as looking for ways to improve gas mileage. Hypermiling techniques would be a great idea.
Look, I have read a lot of the replies and the article and have also been doing extensive research on the web after I came into contact with a local man in my area who showed me this amazing yet simple device he made in his garage. I have read up on the history of Gasoline vs California and the attempt made by California to force the Oil Companies to formulate their Gas to burn more completely (which they did for a short time which resulted in lower profits due to MGP drastically improved)which was thrown away at the nearest opportunity. Thing is, and has been proven, only 20% on average of the fuel that goes into the combustion chamber burns, and what is left over comes out of the exhaust valves on the cylinder heads. This from what I have read is due Gasoline molecules being very close together and not being able to burn more completely. To be able to improve this would mean you would have to find a way to space the molecules apart a bit, which was accomplished for a short time by the oil companies but found a way to convince the people that the additive was harmful (probably by design knowing them). So we are back to the inefficient formula again. But if there was a way to increase MPG and lower emissions would it be implemented? The problem is the economy we live in is highly dependant on "Oil" revenues, and anything that would rapidly effect those revenues could make the Economy collapse and in effect make the US bankrupt or worse. It is not surprising to me to see the political element wanting to resist these changes and want to cover up something as significant as electrolysis devices that could possibly in short order replace fossil fuels. But I think they won’t be able to keep it under wraps too much longer. Too many people are realizing how simple it is to turn water into Hydrogen and Oxygen. And if Gas is replaced by Water, how could they possibly tax that? Meter on your Garden Hose? I don’t wanna hear the negative bull crap about how inefficient it is and takes way more effort to break down than it is worth
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
smlotr
post Feb 26 2009, 02:22 PM
Post #7


New Club Member
*

Group: Regular Member
Posts: 4
Joined: 25-February 09
Member No.: 89,231
Car Model:GX470
Location:NJ



QUOTE (Randy&Bonnie @ Feb 25 2009, 02:16 PM) *
QUOTE (The G Man @ Feb 25 2009, 07:19 AM) *
QUOTE (specialeffects @ Feb 24 2009, 09:57 PM) *
Hi,
I woulke to start a thread to know what grade of gasoline you use and why? If that grade gives u the best mileage.

I used 87 and got 14 mpg , with 91 I get 18.5 mpg


There is no way you can get that big of a difference in mileage lol.



It does sound like a big leap. But if the factory specs call for 91, then it's possible you could see a drop in mileage using 87.

In order to get a good comparison test, you'd have to carefully monitor the factors that can change A/F, gasoline/engine performance and use more than just a couple of tanks of fuel....

Was the gas used from the same brand and gas station?
Was the test route driven exactly the same with the same MPH under the same driving conditions?
Was the ambient air temp, RH, and barometric pressure the same?
Did you measure and start with the exact same amount of gas in your tank?




believe it or not proper tire inflation does increase mpg...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
specialeffects
post Mar 26 2009, 09:43 PM
Post #8


New Club Member
*

Group: Regular Member
Posts: 14
Joined: 23-December 08
Member No.: 85,277
Car Model:2004, GX470
Location:Phoenix



I am now getting 20 in City with Costco Premium gas in Phoenix for over a month, yes in stop an go conditions not highway. biggrin.gif biggrin.gif biggrin.gif




QUOTE (smlotr @ Feb 26 2009, 01:22 PM) *
QUOTE (Randy&Bonnie @ Feb 25 2009, 02:16 PM) *
QUOTE (The G Man @ Feb 25 2009, 07:19 AM) *
QUOTE (specialeffects @ Feb 24 2009, 09:57 PM) *
Hi,
I woulke to start a thread to know what grade of gasoline you use and why? If that grade gives u the best mileage.

I used 87 and got 14 mpg , with 91 I get 18.5 mpg


There is no way you can get that big of a difference in mileage lol.



It does sound like a big leap. But if the factory specs call for 91, then it's possible you could see a drop in mileage using 87.

In order to get a good comparison test, you'd have to carefully monitor the factors that can change A/F, gasoline/engine performance and use more than just a couple of tanks of fuel....

Was the gas used from the same brand and gas station?
Was the test route driven exactly the same with the same MPH under the same driving conditions?
Was the ambient air temp, RH, and barometric pressure the same?
Did you measure and start with the exact same amount of gas in your tank?




believe it or not proper tire inflation does increase mpg...

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BobsGX470
post Mar 31 2009, 07:01 PM
Post #9


Advanced Club Member
***

Group: Regular Member
Posts: 122
Joined: 7-September 05
From: CA
Member No.: 20,452
Car Model: 2007 GX470
Location:CA



[quote name='specialeffects' date='Mar 26 2009, 11:43 PM' post='363770']
I am now getting 20 in City with Costco Premium gas in Phoenix for over a month, yes in stop an go conditions not highway. biggrin.gif biggrin.gif biggrin.gif

I hope you are not going by the on board mpg computer. Those things are always optimistic by 2-5 mpg. Figure it out the old fashioned way with pen and paper. Or for those that forgot how to divide, use a calculator.




Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JimsGX
post Mar 31 2009, 07:29 PM
Post #10


Advanced Club Member
***

Group: Regular Member
Posts: 126
Joined: 7-May 04
From: MA
Member No.: 8,386
Car Model:08-GX470, 08-ES350, 91-LS400
Location:MA



I use Shell 93 Octane in my 08 GX and 91 LS400... Both cars run better on it than other brands of fuel I've used in the past. Shell puts a lot of detergent in the fuel. I get 19 on the highway and 16 or so in the city.

Top Tier Fuel Companies
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Wacko999
post Apr 1 2009, 06:20 PM
Post #11


New Club Member
*

Group: Regular Member
Posts: 2
Joined: 16-January 04
Member No.: 5,373
Car Model:2009 GX-470 Blizzard Pearl, 2008 ES-350 Royal Ruby Mica
Location:Denver



I use 85 octane due to the the elevation here in Denver with no problems.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
denslexusgx470
post Apr 1 2009, 07:17 PM
Post #12


LOC Moderator
Group Icon

Group: Super Moderator
Posts: 2,885
Joined: 21-June 04
From: Fresno,CA
Member No.: 9,735
Car Model:2003 Sand Dollar Pearl Lexus GX470, 2006 Natural White Toyota 4Runner, 2009 Space Gray Metallic BMW 528i
Location:Fresno, California



91 is always recommended... but as far as required fuel, the non vvt-i engines (03-04) do NOT require 91 and may run on 87 but the 05-present have the VVt-i engine that require 91
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Harley Rider
post Apr 5 2009, 07:59 PM
Post #13


New Club Member
*

Group: Regular Member
Posts: 8
Joined: 13-April 04
From: S/E Michigan
Member No.: 7,706
Car Model:GX470, GS300
Location:S/E Michigan



We've been driving our 2005 GX between S-E Michigan and DC area every other month or so for the past 3 years. We've tried 87, 89, 91 (sometimes mixing 89 and 93 - 91 is hard to find), as well as straight 93. Using 93 costs around 10% more than 87, but regularly gets us 10-12% better mileage - same trip, same driving habits - so I have been using 93 (or an 89-93 blend when I have the time). Averaging around 17 in my 34 mile daily commute and 19-plus on our DC trips (as high as 22mpg on one trip with a tail wind) - staying within Ohio's posted speed limits. All mileages from calculation, NOT from the trip computer, which always registers 1.2 to 1.4 mpg higher than calculated.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nc211
post Apr 13 2009, 02:41 PM
Post #14


Guru Member
Group Icon

Group: Gold Member
Posts: 3,164
Joined: 8-February 05
From: Glen Ellyn, IL
Member No.: 15,797
Car Model:1995 LS400 "sold in 2007" / 2001 GS430 / 2005 4Runner V8
Location:Glen Ellyn, IL



My 05' 4runner has the exact same engine as the GX (4.7 liter V8 vvti). I have only put premium in it once, and have never had a single problem. During our migration from NC to Chicago last February (845 miles) though West Virginia mountains and the flat lands of Ohio and Indiana. I kept all receipts of all fuel bills, and set the trip odemeter at 0' as we were pulling out of the driveway. We were loaded down too with stuff, 3 cats, and a fish in the cup holder. Average mileage for the trip on regular gas? 22.3mpgs. That is on the old fashioned way of calculation too, not the car's computer read out. I have never had a "ping" problem, rough idle, or squat. So I am hesitant to spend the extra $$ on premium.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Dr.Gee
post Apr 16 2009, 08:16 AM
Post #15


Club Member
**

Group: Regular Member
Posts: 68
Joined: 4-December 05
Member No.: 21,997
Car Model:2006 GX 470
Location:The D



I use the high test stuff and get about an extra 50 miles per tank.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 21st November 2009 - 04:27 AM